We will keep you updated on all upcoming events.

There’re transcendental arguments for the existence of God, am I right? These arguments try to prove that axioms atheists also have to use in order to argue are inconsistent with atheist’s ideas when we’re dealing with justifying them.

For example, an internet forum contributor has a nickname is called ‘GooseHenry’ argues that ‘there’s no possibility for an atheist to argue that apple will taste as an apple in the next year as well’. (a) Then, an atheist can’t account for the universality of logical rules.

I want to present a set of arguments to prove that atheists should justify that there’s no another universe inconsistent with logical rules in order to argue even for the lack of belief of God.

When you argue that there can only be a universe in a way to be able to be understood logically because of the nature of the world is reflected the nature of God who has an identity wholly logical axiomatically; then there’s no need to use any other arguments to justify the universality of logic to argue.

But if you’re an atheist, you also have to account for that there can’t be another universe can’t behave, be understood or be interpreted logically to argue for the universe we live in. Here are the arguments:

1-      In order to differentiate things logically and in the sphere of logical laws; firstly we have to prove that these things can be understood with our logical abilities and rules.

2-      If there can be another universe can’t be understood and interpreted logically; then you can’t differentiate our universe’s rules and the others’ rules; you can’t differentiate inside and outside.

3-      If we can’t differentiate ‘inside’ and ‘outside’, then we also can’t use logical laws for the universe we live in.

4-      Then, in order to argue logically in this universe, we have to firstly be sure that there can’t be a universe has an illogical nature –namely has no nature in normal terms- to argue for this universe.

5-      Christians argue that there can’t be an illogical-natured universe because of the very existence of God axiomatically.

6-      But atheists also have to prove that there can’t be a universe illogical.

7-      So, to argue even for the lack of belief, the atheist has to prove that there can’t be a universe illogical.

8-      It means, the atheist also has to prove something and share some of the burden of proof of the theist arguer.

Am I right? I’m waiting for your comments…

We will keep you updated on all upcoming events.

When presented with the opportunity, someone was bound to do it…

http://heinermann.kakkoister.com/

It’s called “Death By…” Don’t want to say too much about it here, so go check it out for yourself!

Link: http://deathby.subliminalfuture.com/

 It’s the unofficial guide of how to die by… well just about anything really… I only really made 2 of these, but there was a third… somewhere, It’s lost or something.

I really liked drawing these, and might actually start it up again. Don’t get too comfortable with my art style, because it may change

posting a new comic in about 5 mins.

 Anyways, enjoy!

Maybe if I run across it again I’ll get a scan for better quality.

We have opened our community so everyone has a place to chat, get support and digitally commute away from the world! Our community is still under development, so design changes will probably occur quite often until we are satisfied, but feel free to join up, start chatting, create a blog, whatever!

More changes on the way, take care for now!

Pig vs. Man… vs… asian cop… guy thing… manbearpig

Did this during algebra class, sophmore year?… I think

We will keep you updated on all upcoming events.

Take care and happy blogging.

Don’t think I have to explain this one too much. 

This is not my first comic done, but it’s definately one of the first.

 If you hadn’t noticed, the comic has the same name as the series… This is where I got the name, I liked “The Other Side of the Road” so it stuck.